Montag, März 27, 2006

Fisches Nachtgesang (The Lullaby of the Fish)

Here's a "song" by German writer Christian Morgenstern called "Fisches Nachtgesang" ("The Lullaby of the Fish"). I've always been interested in this kind of creativity, when an artist fathoms the possibilties and the boundaries of his profession vis-à-vis another kind of art...I hope, you enjoy it...!

If you want to know, what I've created with real songs of animals of the sea (Chants of the Humpback Whales), then visit my Song-Site, just by clicking the link " Some Music Made By Me" on the right side of this Blog and choose "Wal-Party"...!

Tacet ! (Enjoy the Silence!)

In a world, which is full of noise and chattering and where music harasses us in every situation (dancing music, shopping music, music for relaxation...), there's time for a pause!

So here is one complete work of the american composer John Cage, called "4'33", it was composed in 1952. Just lean back and enjoy:

Set I

TACET

Set II

TACET

Set III

TACET

After enjoying it, you can find out more about the work and the intentions of John Cage at this place...:

  • 4'33 by John Cage
  • What Is Jazz?

    Some time ago there was a long discussion on a European Jazz BBS in the Internet, dealing with the question: What is Jazz?

    It was interesting to read all these statements of self-proclaimed experts. Some were referring to the social side of Jazz Music, others were referring to harmony and music theory and others even made philosophical remarks. But finally they got no satisfying answer to this question.

    My question is: Do we really need to define a music style? Do we need to find terms and definitions for that phenomenon called "Music"? O.K., in a discussion it might be useful to use certain terms to make clear, of what kind of music one is talking about, but some of these "experts" seem to spend more time with searching for adequate terms, than doing or listening to music.

    Charlie Parker once was asked in an interview: "Can you explain,what Be-Bop is all about?" and he answered: "No, I can't, and I wish, you would easily call it 'Music'...!"

    That's it!!!

    Sonntag, März 19, 2006

    Classic Meets Pop

    There has been a new trend on the music market for the last couple of years, which tries to create a new audience for classical music. In times, in which there are less people in the concert halls, more and more record labels and musicians are trying to present classical music in a more "trendy" way, by re-arranging the works of the last centuries. Ensembles like "Rondo Veneziano", which is playing arrangements mostly originally composed by W.A. Mozart and "André Rieu", whose ensemble is doing mostly arrangements of waltzes of the Strauss-Dynasty from Vienna have a tremendous success with their performances and all their records are bestsellers.

    So is this a good trend to find a new audience for classical music?

    In my opinion it's always good, when people, who never came in contact with classical music in their life before, find their way to this musical genre. But the sad thing is, that this has no or only a little effect on the situation of the "real" classical music scene, because the listeners get stuck in this state of their musical taste. They probably think, that Mozart's music is originally composed with an E- Bass and drums and don't care about the original work. It's enough for them to see the musicians of "Rondo Veneziano", wearing rococo perukes and rococo costumes to have the illusion of a "classical concert". And it's the same with the Orchestra of "André Rieu", which tries to create the illusion of a concert of the art nouveau epoch. It's only the hokey cliché of the original composition but easy consumable utility music,the best music to listen to during the hen party...! I think, sooner or later, this will kill music as an art, if people are only taking it as background music.

    But on the other hand, we have to keep in mind, that also in the era of Rococo and Romantic, music mostly was entertainment for the upper class and not seldom, the composers were forced to create music just for the fun of these ignorants, because of the money! There's a true story of Beethoven: He was invited to play some of his compositions during an aristocratic jollification, so he was sitting at the piano and while he played his music, the people were just playing cards and were chattering all the time. So after some time Beethoven slammed down the cover of the keyboard, ran to the door and while leaving he shouted: "I'm not playing any longer for these ignorant pigs!!" So things haven't changed so much during the centuries...

    But there are also good examples in contemporary music: There are a lot of Jazz musicians, who re-arrange classical music. It all started with Jacques Loussier's "Play Bach"-records in the sixties and a lot of Jazz musicians followed to "play" with classical compositions, i.e. the "Eugen Cicero Trio" in Germany and the "Gordon Goodwin's Big Phat Band " in the U.S.A. They are not only adding a modern beat to the original, but create something totally new with their arrangements.

    If this will encourage a lot of listeners to listen to the original work as well, it would be the best thing. The original always is a better thing, than the cheap pseudo-modernisation of the masterworks of the last centuries!